- See more at: http://blogtimenow.com/blogging/automatically-redirect-blogger-blog-another-blog-website/#sthash.Q6qPkwFC.dpuf Montefiore Leads Fight For Sugary Drinks Tax | Bronx News Networkbronx

Monday, April 12, 2010

Montefiore Leads Fight For Sugary Drinks Tax

On Friday morning, Dr. Steven Safyer (speaking in video), the president of Montefiore Medical Center, made an impassioned plea for the implementation of the sugary drinks tax, a.k.a. the "soda tax."

The fight for and against this proposed state tax -- which health officials say would amount to about a 17% increase in the cost of drinks with a high sugar content (Coke, Pepsi, Snapple, Orange Crush, etc.) -- is being waged on airwaves, in supermarkets and on city streets.

Crain's estimated last week that the beverage industry (against the tax) and the Alliance for a Healthier New York (for the tax) had each spent some $2.9 million on their respective campaigns.

The beverage industry is making the argument that this is an unfair tax that will hit working-class families hardest. But Safyer, who spoke at a press conference at the Children's Hospital at Montefiore, and the alliance say it will only affect families who continue to make the unhealthy choice of buying sugar-heavy drinks that are a primary culprit in the the Bronx's (and the state's) growing obesity and diabetes "epidemic."

Health care officials say this tax is an easy win-win. It will cut consumption of sugary drinks by an estimated 10% (which obviously isn't good news for the beverage companies) which, in turn, will prevent 150,000 people from becoming obese, according to Deputy Health Department Commissioner Dr. Andrew Goodman, who also participated in the press conference.

In addition, while it's unclear exactly where the tax money will go, Ken Raske, president and CEO of the Greater New York Hospital Association, said the funding would go back into the state's struggling hospitals. He pointed to the recent shuttering of lower Manhattan's St. Vincent's Hospital as a reminder of what can happen when a facility is "chronically" underfunded.

Montefiore kicked off the press conference with a health fair where they showed some of the effects of drinking soda. Doctors there compared the proposed tax to the taxes on cigarettes, saying the taxes had proved effective. They compared the obesity epidemic to tuberculosis outbreaks and the spread of AIDS/HIV in the 1980s.

This fight, inevitably, will end up in the hands of the state legislature. So far, Bronx senators Jeff Klein and Ruth Hassell-Thompson have stated their opposition to the tax, while Assemblyman Jeff Dinowitz says he's for it. If you know of others who have stated their position, let us know.


  1. http://www.nysenate.gov/press-release/reaction-statement-new-york-state-senate-majority-leader-pedro-espada-jr-governors-bud

    "On the Governor's proposal to implement a tax on soda and other sugar-laden beverages, Sen. Espada said, “That's the easy way out. If we truly want to make an impact on reversing juvenile obesity and diabetes, we must find ways to support reimbursement for health centers and nutritionists who are doing the real work on the front lines of our communities in this effort to prevent chronic obesity and diabetes among children and adults.”


    "On the issue of the proposed “Sugar Tax,” Senator Espada said that he was opposed to attaching a revenue source to a health issue, and that the tax would not pass. He added that jobs would be lost, and that he introduced a bill about school food that could be a contributor to childhood obesity.

    There are several soft drink companies and distributors on the list of campaign contributors for Espada:

  2. Klein and Hassell-Thompson have a bunch of contributions from the soda industry as well. Klein has several contributions from an outfit which calls itself "Convenience PAC" -as I suspected, they are the PAC of the NY Association of Convenience Stores. How very convenient for Mr. Klein.

    Pay to play. Anyone else think we need real campaign finance reform in NYS?

  3. Regarding my first post with the Espada quotes. For some reason my commentary did not make it in the post. Probably something I did wrong. In case it is not clear -- my point is: Pedro is on the record as being against the tax. Pedro gets money from the soda industry. Pedro holds himself out as a health care expert. Dr. Sayfer and the real health care experts are the ones to whom we should be listening. Not a Senator bought and paid for by the soft drink industry.

  4. Why not raise the price bottle and can deposit from 5 cents to 25 cents. It will discourage the purchase of sodas and give the homeless scavengers a chance to make good money. It will also help the environment.


Bronx News Network reserves the right to remove comments that include personal attacks, name calling, foul language, commercial advertisements, spam, or any language that might be considered threatening, libelous or inciting hate.

User comments are reviewed by BxNN staff and may be included or excluded at our discretion.

If what you have to say is unrelated to this particular post, please visit our readers' forum.